|
THE STRATEGY CONSULTATION IS NOW CLOSED. Many thanks for all the excellent and useful comments. We are currently planning how the final strategy will be published, which we expect to happen in spring. If you have any further comments or queries, don't hesitate to get in touch: karin@involve.org.uk. |
Steers from the Involve visioning day indicated that Involve should:
What we will aim to do:
What we will not do:
Measuring Success:
|
|
You can comment anonymously, or let us know your name by writing it in the comment box or by first registering on the wiki - click 'Sign Up' in the top right hand corner of the screen. This is the end of the consultation. Thank you for your input! |
Comments (3)
Dec 07, 2006
Tom Burke says:
It would be nice if you were a bit bolder here not just 'supporting' but changin...It would be nice if you were a bit bolder here - not just 'supporting' but changing. transforming. making a difference.
Would suggest you link back the barriers to participation you mention earlier in the 'challenges affecting people's willingness to participate'.
Dec 07, 2006
Tom Burke says:
Sorry accidentally posted that for the previous section here too. On NETWORKING:...Sorry - accidentally posted that for the previous section here too.
On NETWORKING:
Need to make clear how your network adds value and compliments other networks such as the Participation Workers Network for England, the regional interact networks and the more informal peer support networks in regions and cities.
Dec 08, 2006
Phil Green says:
Strongly support much greater priority for the network. The fact that this comes...Strongly support much greater priority for the network. The fact that this comes last suggests perhaps you're not quite convinced yet? If the network is seen to come first in your thinking then this acknowledges and recognises that the whole network are potential contributors to the other things (Advocacy, new thinking, better practice, etc)
Suggest there is a strong need for an organisation such as Involve to tackle the wider question of how to resource networks generally (not just Involve's own network).
Suggest priority for network development should be the face to face stuff (the virtual stuff will take care of itself over time) avoiding anything remotely top down, but not necessarily going to the opposite extreme of events so loose and unstructured as to appear un thought out.
Add Comment